“Why has lightning not struck twice?” asked Dr. Catherine Bollard, a bone marrow transplant specialist with Children’s National Health System and George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences in Washington, D.C.
Possibly, it has. At an international HIV/AIDS meeting in Paris in July, scientists reported on a European cohort of patients with HIV who have successfully undergone bone marrow transplants for advanced leukemias and lymphomas. Five such patients have been followed for more than two years and appear to be HIV-free.
But while their HIV may be cured or in remission, the only test is to take them off their antiretroviral medication — something that has not yet been done because of lessons learned several years ago when two Boston patients were believed to be cured and taken off daily treatment only to have their HIV come back.
In the meantime, researchers continue to try to tease out how, exactly, the transplant cured Brown and how they can fashion a less risky approach suitable for people who aren’t also facing life-threatening cancers.
Weighing the factors
One of the biggest challenges to curing HIV is the existence of so-called “reservoirs” of dormant, HIV-infected cells. Combination antiretroviral therapies developed in the mid-1990s suppress active virus, turning HIV from a certain death sentence to a chronic, manageable disease. But these drugs don’t affect the HIV reservoirs, and even a tiny number of latently infected cells are enough to re-seed infection if a person with HIV stops taking lifelong medication.
Brown has been off medication for 10 years and — although reservoirs are notoriously difficult to find, much less measure — the virus has not returned. Before his transplant, he underwent conditioning, an intense chemotherapy and radiation regimen that destroys the immune system to make room for transplanted immune cells to grow. Could that pretransplant conditioning have also destroyed his HIV reservoir? Was it the donor that his German doctor located, whose cells carried a rare, HIV-resistant mutation? Afterward, he developed graft-vs.-host disease, or GVHD — a serious, often fatal condition in which the newly donated immune system attacks the patient’s body as “foreign.” What about that?
Research from Fred Hutch’s Dr. Chris Peterson, who works in Kiem’s lab, found that conditioning may play less of a role than first believed, which is good news, given how hard it is to go through. Conditioning before stem cell transplants for cancer patients is done for two purposes: to kill cancer cells and to make room for the donor immune cells. For HIV, Peterson showed in preclinical models that total body irradiation did not have much of an impact on the size of the viral reservoir.
“These results suggest that the focus going forward should be on a conditioning regimen that is less toxic, focusing not on killing the reservoir but just making room for engraftment,” he said. “The side effects of conditioning are just not worth it. And as anyone who’d gone through it or knows someone who’s gone through it knows, it’s not fun.”
Oregon Health and Sciences University researcher Dr. Jonah Sacha, who like Peterson works on preclinical models of HIV, believes that GVHD did play a key role. His theory prompted a question from Brown.
“Why do you think it was the GVHD that cured me?” he asked.
“We know that the graft-vs.-leukemia effect is so potent,” Sacha said.
A pivotal early study on leukemia patients who had bone marrow transplants showed that patients with nonidentical twin donors who developed GVHD had lower rates of cancer recurrence, suggesting a graft-vs.-leukemia effect — that is, the transplanted immune system did not merely replace the one destroyed by conditioning but actually played a role in curing leukemia. But Sacha assured Brown that, as with immunotherapy research in cancer, HIV cure researchers are looking for less-toxic ways to harness that effect.
As for Bollard, she believes that bone marrow transplant specialists should put a higher priority on finding donors that carry the resistance gene that Brown’s donor did. June, who does HIV as well as cancer research, is working on genetically engineering such a mutation in a patient’s own T cells, and Fred Hutch’s Kiem is working on a similar approach in stem cells.
Innovations in the works
For now, CAR T cells are labor-intensive and highly individualized — June calls them “personalized serial killer cells.” But just as cars — as in automobiles — went from being hand-built to factory-made, he predicted that T-cell therapies would become mass-produced as well.
“Since we’re in Seattle, I’ll talk Microsoft,” he said. “We’re Windows 1.0 for CAR T cells now. We’ll have a series of innovations in this area and an increase in sophistication.”
And CAR T cells are not the only innovation on the table. In addition to exploring CAR T-cell therapies, defeatHIV is investigating using gene therapy to induce production of a synthetic “super antibody” to target HIV and adding a therapeutic vaccine to boost the proliferation and function of genetically modified HIV-resistant cells. And, along with defeatHIV, the National Institutes of Health has funded five other public-private HIV cure research groups that are focusing on ways to kick the viral reservoirs awake, studying other immunotherapy approaches used in cancer such as drugs known as checkpoint inhibitors, and developing nanoparticle “backpacks” to deliver virus-killing T cells.
Talk at the conference included these and other approaches, including research on a slow-release form of antiretroviral therapy that would work in combination with the CRISPR gene-editing tool and a study on broadly neutralizing antibodies that may be able to stop the establishment of the HIV reservoir in infants born with HIV if given within the first two days of life. (To date, three children have been reported to be HIV-free after very early treatment with antiretroviral therapy, though in one the virus returned. Scientists say it's too early to know if the other cases are cures or long-term remissions.)
Also presenting at the conference was social scientist Dr. Karine Dubé of the University of North Carolina’s Gillings School of Global Public Health, who spoke of the need to keep HIV clinical trials “patient-centered” and to address concerns about the risks of taking part in HIV cure research, particularly of interrupting antiretroviral treatment. And as is typical of HIV conferences, nonscientists representing and advocating for people with HIV were introduced and applauded.
“One of the things we feel strongly about is involving the community,” said Jerome at the conference opening.