Shepherd recently recounted how she benefitted from her mentor, Ramesh Rengan, MD, PhD, who leads the radiation oncology department at Fred Hutch and UW Medicine.
“He was my research mentor in medical school. I was partnered with him by the department and he has significantly shaped the course of my career,” said Shepherd. “I knew about radiation oncology, but during this research fellowship, Dr. Rengan exposed me to the many different aspects of the field. He influenced my decision to go into radiation oncology, provided perspective on different residency programs, and offered guidance about how to connect with colleagues at different institutions. He was always open to giving me his time.”
Shepherd herself has several mentees from her previous position in New York. She continues to give her mentees guidance and is looking forward to helping new ones at Fred Hutch, once a mentorship program is fully established for the radiation oncology department.
“Mentors are incredibly valuable to career development in radiation oncology. Without a mentor it’s hard to figure out the educational and career paths in the field,” she said. “You rely on people who’ve been through it before.”
Smith Apisarnthanarax, MD, professor and radiation oncologist who sees patients at the proton therapy facility, is currently expanding the mentorship program at Fred Hutch and UW Medicine. Right now, the program exists for junior providers on an academic track and for medical physicists. Other faculty will also be able to take part in mentorship in the future.
Mentorships are designed to facilitate the career development of junior faculty (assistant professors) by pairing them with senior faculty (associate professors or professors).
“The department stakes are pretty high,” said Apisarnthanarax. “You have six years to be promoted, or you leave. However, it isn’t just about promotion. We want to be able to foster the junior faculty members’ specific needs.”
The mentorship program was established about two years ago by pairing mentors with mentees. To create more focused pairings, Apisarnthanarax has developed surveys for both parties involved.
“I need to understand both sides in order to create good connections,” said Apisarnthanarax. “What are the strengths individual senior faculty members can offer, and what are the needs and desires that junior faculty members want to get out of the relationship?”
For example, if a junior faculty member is interested in clinical trials, Apisarnthanarax, among other considerations, will try to pair that person up with a physician who has extensive experience in designing, leading and running clinical studies.
“Physicians with good mentorship often step into roles where they can lead, educate and innovate,” said Apisarnthanarax. “Mentors help young physicians define who they want to be in our field and to become well-rounded, compassionate and resilient physicians, which benefit patients.”
There is a lot of data behind the need for a mentorship program. But how much individuals get out of the program is up to them, said Apisarnthanarax. To really encourage them to make the most of it, he is also hoping to do some team-building activities that involve everyone in the program, to jump start their involvement.
Right now, about half the senior physicians and half the senior medical physicists have agreed to be mentors. But there have been requests to expand the program to include not just mentorship for junior faculty, but of mid-level faculty, especially those who have come from other institutions, and of clinical (non-academic) faculty as well. The hope is to be able to meet the needs of all faculty so that they have the type of mentorship experience that Shepherd benefitted from.