Many cells comprise the tumor microenvironment, but endothelial cells are particularly crucial. They line blood vessels, regulating blood flow and inflammation, and their cell junctions are the gateway for life-giving nutrients or tumor-killing immune cells. As such, they represent the first contact of immune cells with the tumor microenvironment. It is not surprising, then, that many tumors recruit endothelial cells to promote angiogenesis—blood vessel formation—without which tumors cannot grow much bigger than a few millimeters in diameter.
A highly vascularized cancer that is especially reliant on tumor endothelial cells is clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Almost 80% of malignant tumors in the kidney are ccRCC, and the 5-year survival rate remains disappointing. Current standard of care is a combination of drugs that target vascular growth factor receptors in order to kill tumor endothelial cells (TECs) and deprive the tumor of its blood supply in combination with antibodies that augment anti-tumor immune responses.
There are still unanswered questions of what factors make TECs support tumor growth. Previous studies have investigated the overall tumor microenvironment via single-cell RNA profiling, but none have analyzed TECs specifically to determine if they differ from normal endothelial cells. To close this gap, Dr. Yuexin Xu, a staff scientist in Dr. Edus “Hootie” Warren’s lab, performed a deep dive into TEC identity in a study recently published in BJC Reports. Their lab used flow cytometry to specifically enrich for either TECs or normal endothelial cells (NECs), then used single cell sequencing to analyze each cell type, similar to how they previously profiled infiltrating immune cells in ccRCC tumors.
Dr. Xu and colleagues already knew that NECs need to have a variety of gene expression patterns to specialize as venous, arterial, capillary, or lymphatic vasculatures. By contrast, they found that TECs have a more homogenous phenotype. TECs also express more angiogenic factors compared to NECs, and they often down-regulate MHC markers, which could help the tumors evade detection by the immune system.
There was one gene that stood out as a reliable and specific marker for TECs: insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3). This caught the authors’ attention, as IGFBP3 has been used as a biomarker for other cancers. “Increased expression of IGFBP3 in RCC (and also in lung and colorectal cancer) was associated with inferior overall survival”, the study points out. “However, direct targeting of IGFBP3 as a common TEC-directed therapy may not be straightforward since it appears to have tumor-promoting and anti-tumor effects in different cancers.”
Xu also compared endothelial cells from ccRCC to those from a study on liver cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma, or HCC). She found that normal endothelial cells differed in gene expression patterns by over 50%, suggesting that these cells have organ-specific roles. In contrast, not only are TECs within each tumor type homogenous, more of their gene expression profiles were shared between the two separate cancers than for their NEC counterparts. This means that TECs from different tumors share similar tumor-promoting phenotypes. It also raises the possibility of using a common TEC targeting strategy to treat different types of tumor.